[Snyk] Fix for 2 vulnerabilities#15
Conversation
The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade: - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-JSPDF-14873131 - https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-PLAYWRIGHT-14888269
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to 529bd33 in 34 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
21lines of code in1files - Skipped
0files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
2draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. package.json:79
- Draft comment:
Major upgrade for jspdf (from ^2.5.1 to ^4.0.0) may introduce breaking API changes. Verify compatibility in the application. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is about a major version upgrade of a library, which could potentially introduce breaking changes. However, it asks the PR author to verify compatibility, which is against the rules. The comment does not provide a specific suggestion or point out a specific issue in the code.
2. package.json:87
- Draft comment:
Minor version bump for next (from ^15.3.0 to ^15.3.8). Confirm that no integration issues arise. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%This comment is about a minor version bump for a dependency, which falls under the rule of not commenting on pure dependency changes. Additionally, it asks the author to confirm that no integration issues arise, which is against the rule of not asking the author to confirm or ensure things.
Workflow ID: wflow_RVKJYCTIyDSAjbnm
You can customize by changing your verbosity settings, reacting with 👍 or 👎, replying to comments, or adding code review rules.
🤖 Augment PR SummarySummary: Upgrades 🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎 |
| "i18next-browser-languagedetector": "^7.0.1", | ||
| "i18next-http-backend": "^2.1.1", | ||
| "jspdf": "^2.5.1", | ||
| "jspdf": "^4.0.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
package.json updates jspdf/next, but pnpm-lock.yaml still pins jspdf@2.5.2 and next@15.3.0; with pnpm (and CI using --frozen-lockfile) the upgrade won’t actually take effect and may fail installs. Consider regenerating/committing the lockfile so the security fix is applied reproducibly.
🤖 Was this useful? React with 👍 or 👎
Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the pnpm dependencies of this project.
Snyk changed the following file(s):
package.jsonVulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:
SNYK-JS-JSPDF-14873131
SNYK-JS-PLAYWRIGHT-14888269
Important
Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.
For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic
Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:
🦉 Learn about vulnerability in an interactive lesson of Snyk Learn.
Important
Fix vulnerabilities by upgrading
jspdfandnextinpackage.json; manual update needed forpnpm-lock.yaml.jspdffrom^2.5.1to^4.0.0inpackage.jsonto fix critical vulnerability SNYK-JS-JSPDF-14873131.nextfrom^15.3.0to^15.3.8inpackage.jsonto fix high severity vulnerability SNYK-JS-PLAYWRIGHT-14888269.pnpm-lock.yamlnot updated; requires manual update before merging.This description was created by
for 529bd33. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.